Axisymmetric Instabilities
Beyond some limit, roughly defined by
Nonaxisymmetric modes ==> J can be re-distributed both internally
and through coupling to external wave fields and if their growth is
unchecked, they can the object to fission.
Dynamic Instability
if the frequency
T/|W| > 0.09-0.14 ==> secularly unstable
T/|W| > 0.27 ==> dynamically unstable
Q: Roughly, what is the order
of the critical T/|W|'s?
Comments--
Amazingly, results based on incompressible fluids are relatively good
predictors of the stability properties of even highly compressible
objects.
GM2/R2 - Mv2/R ~ 0
or, alternatively, as
P2 ~ R3/(GM) ~ 1/density,
axisymmetric instabilities set in (ring formation, mass shedding, ...).
Nonaxisymmetric Instabilities
Typically, nonaxisymmetric instabilities also set in at high rotation
rates (but usually before the axisymmetric instabilities).
Nonaxisymmetric instabilities break the symmetry which has important
consequences (the first mode to set in drives an oblate object to
a triaxial state), that is, it forms a bar.
Kinds of Instability: Secular and Dynamic Instability
Secular Instability
Calculational Details and General Results.
The Jacobi and Dedekind ellipsoids have lower total energy than does the
corresponding Maclaurin spheroid. So, if a dissipative mechanism exists ==> can
drive a Maclaurin spheroid to the
lower energy state on a dissipative time scale
tsec >> tdyn
Some modes become dynamically unstable in that for small perturbations,
Q = Q0 + Q1 exp(i[fR+ifimag]t), where |Q1/Q0| << 1,
fimag < 0
==> perturbation grows exponentially on a dynamic time scale
In terms of T/|W|, where T is the total bulk kinetic energy of the model and W is
total gravitational energy of the model, the essential stability results
for the lowest order nonaxisymmetric mode, the bar mode (m=2 for a mode
with harmonic azimuthal dependence), are:
for all compressibilities and angular momentum distributions tested.
Virial Theorem ==> 2(Trot+Tthermal) + W = 0 ==>
T/|W| = 1/2 for an object supported solely by rotation.
Quantitative comparisons between the eigenvalues found by linear and
nonlinear numerical codes agree to within 1 % in the best cases and to
10 to 15 % in the worst cases (of those considered reliable). In addition,
the linear, quasi-linear, and nonlinear techniques unambiguously
determined the instability saturation mechanism which allows predictions
of the nonlinear outcome of nonaxisymmetric instabilities
to be made for a much larger range
of parameter space than was previously possible.