| |
Title Page
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Physical Modeling
3. Numerical Results
4. Summary
|
2. PHYSICAL MODELING
2.1 Fizzlers
- Traditional Fizzler Scenario
Gold (1974), Lightman & Shapiro (1976), Tohline (1984),
Hayashi, Eriguchi, & Hashimoto (1998,1999);
Aborted core collapse due to rotation with a subsequent
quasistatic approach to neutron star densities driven
by the gravitational radiation reaction (GRR) driven secular
instability.
- Modified Fizzler Scenario
Imamura & Durisen (2000), Imamura, Durisen, & Pickett (2002);
Aborted collapse due to rotation with a subsequent quasistatic
approach driven by deleptonization and cooling to dynamic barlike
instability.
instabilities may set in for T/|W| > 0.14 for large n polytropes).
The evolution of the barlike instability
is driven primarily by the Newtonian self-interaction torque but
angular momentum is also shed to infinity through
gravitational radiation from the bar.
(see Centrella, New, Lowe,
& Brown 2001, Ap. J., L93 for results suggesting that m=1 dynamic
instabilities may set in for T/|W| > 0.14 for large n polytropes
also negating the traditional fizzler scenario.)
2.2 Hydrodynamics Equations
2.3 Numerical Methodology
- Equilibrium Modeling -- Self-consistent field technique
(Hachisu 1986, Imamura & Durisen 2000)
- Linear Modeling -- The initial value problem for the
evolution of infinitesimal perturbations away from equilibrium
is solved
(Toman et al. 1998, Imamura, Durisen, &
Pickett 2000, Imamura & Durisen 2000).
- Quasi-linear Modeling -- The linear eigenfunctions are used to
model the early nonlinear behavior (Imamura, Durisen, &
Pickett 2000, Imamura & Durisen 2000).
- Nonlinear Modeling -- Fully nonlinear hydro equations are solved.
The spatial and temporal derivatives are second-order accurate.
The fluxing is accomplished using the van Leer algorithm
(Pickett, Durisen, & Davis 1996, Imamura, Durisen, & Pickett
2002).
|