Title Page

Outline

1. Introduction

2. Physical Modeling

3. Numerical Results

4. Summary

2. PHYSICAL MODELING

2.1 Fizzlers

  • Traditional Fizzler Scenario

      Gold (1974), Lightman & Shapiro (1976), Tohline (1984), Hayashi, Eriguchi, & Hashimoto (1998,1999); Aborted core collapse due to rotation with a subsequent quasistatic approach to neutron star densities driven by the gravitational radiation reaction (GRR) driven secular instability.

  • Modified Fizzler Scenario

      Imamura & Durisen (2000), Imamura, Durisen, & Pickett (2002); Aborted collapse due to rotation with a subsequent quasistatic approach driven by deleptonization and cooling to dynamic barlike instability. instabilities may set in for T/|W| > 0.14 for large n polytropes). The evolution of the barlike instability is driven primarily by the Newtonian self-interaction torque but angular momentum is also shed to infinity through gravitational radiation from the bar. (see Centrella, New, Lowe, & Brown 2001, Ap. J., L93 for results suggesting that m=1 dynamic instabilities may set in for T/|W| > 0.14 for large n polytropes also negating the traditional fizzler scenario.)

2.2 Hydrodynamics Equations

2.3 Numerical Methodology

  • Equilibrium Modeling -- Self-consistent field technique (Hachisu 1986, Imamura & Durisen 2000)

  • Linear Modeling -- The initial value problem for the evolution of infinitesimal perturbations away from equilibrium is solved (Toman et al. 1998, Imamura, Durisen, & Pickett 2000, Imamura & Durisen 2000).

  • Quasi-linear Modeling -- The linear eigenfunctions are used to model the early nonlinear behavior (Imamura, Durisen, & Pickett 2000, Imamura & Durisen 2000).

  • Nonlinear Modeling -- Fully nonlinear hydro equations are solved. The spatial and temporal derivatives are second-order accurate. The fluxing is accomplished using the van Leer algorithm (Pickett, Durisen, & Davis 1996, Imamura, Durisen, & Pickett 2002).