Its apparent brightness. This is basically the
amount of energy that the star deposits on a detector, whether its your
eyeball or some pixel in a CCD detector. The reason you shouldn't look
directly at the sun is not because the sun is "too bright" but rather the
amount of energy received by your eye is very harmful to it.
Its apparent color. Even with your naked eye you
can see that some stars are blue while others are red. Some of this
color diversity is seen in the image below:

We will later learn that blue stars are hot (and usually young), with
relatively short lifetimes and red stars are cool (usually old) and
have long lifetimes. For now, however, all we care about is that stars
do come in different colors.
The apparent brightness of a star imaged with some detector (i.e. the amount of energy which it registers on the detector) is due to 3 things:
While the first two items are the most important, it nevertheless is important to remember that different detectors can yield different information.
In class excercise
Let's now do the following to
learn about the relationship between exposure time and detection of
a stellar image. Use the the provided worksheet
for this one and the exercise at the end. Hand in the worksheet at
the end of class.
Procedure:
What is the minimum exposure time so that the difference between the numbers in the green box labelled mean and red box labelled mean is approximately 100. Remember, the star is centered in the green box while the detector background (e.g. the brightness of the virtual night sky in this applet) is registered in the red box.
From this exercise, as well as those done previously, it should be
apparent to you that for any given exposure of the sky with any
given telescope plus detector there will be many stars that are
simply too faint to register on the detector.
But the major thing to understand today, is the relationship between apparent brightness and the distance to the star.
The intensity of light observed from a source of constant intrinsic luminosity falls off as the square of the distance from the object. This is known as the inverse square law for light intensity.
![]() |
| The inverse square law for intensity |
Thus, if you double the distance to a light source the observed intensity is decreased to (1/2)2 = 1/4 of its original value. Generally, the ratio of intensities at distances d1 and d2 are
Thus, if you have a known distance to a star and are able to measure the flux at that distance, the total energy output of the star can easily be ascertained (this will be shown in class).
A simple way to think about this, is the following:
This means the total energy output is your measured flux multiplied by the surface area:
So, at R = 1 meter
f = 4 million photons per square
cm per second
; the total surface area is
4p square meters (or 40,000 square centimeters)
so the total Energy emitted is 40,000 x 4 million photons per second.
Now notice, at R = 2 meters f is down to 1 million photons per square cm per second but the total surface are has increased to 16p square meters or 160,000 square centimeters. So the total Energy is 160,000 x 1 million photons per second, which is the same number as before.
Thus if you can measure f at a known distance, then you know the intinsic energy output. The ability to measure f, however, depends upon the DETECTOR!
Example of Inverse Square Law Applet (Point Mode)
In the following, make sure the Point mode is
selected (the applet starts up by default in area mode).
First Set of Exercises: (Flux at specific Distance; distance = 36)
Second Set of Exercises: (Limiting Distance)