


The apparent decline of the salmon in the Columbia river system is one of the most complex environmental problems we have.

However, this problem has been over-simplified by the media and others to one single root cause, namely the construction of hydroelectric dams on the Columbia river system.

Today we wish to access of this simplification is valid. The homework assignment given will allow you to explore this issue in more depth as well. For today we want to examine some of the broader issues and look at the actual data which is available.
The Salmon controversy is an excellent example of arguments made largely on belief, instead of knowledge that is supported by the actual data .
It is also an excellent example/reflection of another problem that effectively prohibits meaningful discourse; reactive vs proactive positions
Factors Causing Salmon Decline:
Broad Brush Factors:
From P. Hurley:
An Estimation of Historic and Current Levels of Salmon Production in the Northeast Pacific Ecosystem:
Evidence of a Nutrient Deficit in the Freshwater Systems of the Pacific Northwest. A comparison of historic and current levels of salmon abundance was used to determine the current deficit of marine-derived nutrients for Pacific Northwest streams. This nutrient deficit may be one indication of ecosystem failure that has contributed to the downward spiral of salmonid abundance, further diminishign the possibility of salmon population recovery to self-sustaining levels.
|
|
Blue line represents growth of non-harvested fish in the Columbia River system. The implication is that competition for food/nutrients is increasing rapidly. |
|
Its getting warmer earlier in the season with time in the Columbia river. Is this cause local (e.g. dams/ag) or global (e.g. Global Warming) |
|
Graph shows harvesting by Tribal communities with protected fishing rights. Some degree of "over harvesting" is apparent. |
|
|
Graph shows total salmon catch off the coast of North America (including Alaska). |
Decline of In-River catches which is
frequently used as the "best" indicator for overall salmon decline
in the Columbia River System: ![]() |
Implication is that increases in ocean catch are directly responsible for decreases of in-river catches also shown. |
That is, if the true salmon count is down by a factor of say 100, relative to what it was 100 years ago, then our salmon efficiency in harvesting would have to increase by at least a factor of 100 to make up the difference. I think this is unlikely.
|
This is the raw salmon count data at Boneville Dam that we will inspect more closely below. Evidence of quasi-cylical behavior is apparent. |
Some relevant WWW resources for the above:


Some Salmon Links
This is likely a reflection of where the Salmon are and this is strongly coupled to decadel climate changes in the Alaska-BC-PNW region.
This implies, that at any particular point in this region, over timescales of 50 years, salmon counts/catches will be cyclical in nature.
So, be careful what you are told without being allowed to see the larger picture: